South Sudan rebel Gatluak Gai killed after peace deal

 


 
 
A key South Sudanese rebel leader, Col Gatluak Gai, who this week signed a peace deal with the government, has been killed.
The exact circumstances of his death are disputed.
Col Gai was shot in the early hours of Saturday morning despite having apparently been reconciled with the South Sudanese army.
South Sudan became independent earlier this month, but is facing at least half a dozen armed rebellions.
The incident happened at or near the district of Pakur in Unity State.
Colonel Gai began his rebellion following elections last year, after the candidate he supported for state governor was controversially declared to be the loser.
This week Col Gai signed a peace agreement with the South Sudan army and was due to be reintegrated into it.

South Sudan's army on Independence Day in Juba, 9 July 2011
Rebels accuse the South Sudanese army
 of being responsible for luring Col Gai to his death
A fellow rebel told the BBC he had been lured into a trap by the army, which then assassinated him.
The army spokesman denied this.
He said Col Gai had been killed in a fight with his deputy, after he had changed his mind about the peace agreement.
Ethnic divide
But it is clear this incident will make the remaining rebel leaders less likely to accept the amnesty offered by President Salva Kiir.
According to a rebel leader who knew him, Gatluak Gai was in his 50s, with an imposing, physical presence.
Although he was not an educated man, he was able to recruit soldiers from the sub-sect of his Nuer ethnic group, which has often been in conflict with South Sudan's biggest group, the Dinka.
Col Gai is survived by many children, and nine of his boys fought in his militia.
One of his daughters is married to Gen Peter Gadet, who leads the most active rebel group in South Sudan.

bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14261525

Heineken CEO: Nigeria Is A Safer Place For Our Company Than Greece

At breakfast in Davos, Heineken CEO Jean-François van Boxmeer, told executives at the conference that he thought Nigeria is safer for his company than Greece, according to DealBook.
He is reported to have said: “Nigeria is more predictable than Greece. I’m speaking of our business."
Boxmeer said he gauged a country by three primary criteria:
Jean-François van Boxmeer,
Jean-François van Boxmeer,
Chief Executive, Heineken
1. Population
2. GDP growth
3. Stability.
Though his advice may be a good rule of thumb he pointed out that perhaps this made sense because his company was in the business of making beer. In keeping with his statement though, Heineken acquired two business in Nigeria on January 12, a move that will boost its capacity to 3.7 million hectoliters. 
In their third quarter earnings report, the company released a statement attributing a 1% drop in volume in Central and Eastern Europe and a drop in consumption due to austerity measures in places like Greece. In comparison there was 12% volume growth in Africa with Nigeria accounting for the most growth in the region.


 http://www.businessinsider.com/heineken-nigeria-greece-2011-1#ixzz1SxsX2TBO

Sudan musicians fear return to the 'Stone Age'

 
Khartoum hip-hop group Rezoulution say
 they free to rap about politics - up to a point
  
When hardline Islamists took control of Sudan in 1989, they made it clear that a lot of music was not acceptable.
"Women and the arts are the two great casualties of the Islamists," says Sudanese human rights activist Albaqir Alafif Mukhtar.
Songs about that old musical staple - romantic love - were particularly frowned upon.
Some musicians were banned from staging concerts and many musicians, artists and intellectuals fled the country.
At the time the Muslim north, which implemented Sharia law, was engaged in a devastating civil war with the south, where most people follow Christianity and traditional religions.

“Start Quote

If I was in charge I would ban all concerts”
End Quote Khartoum resident
Morality police

The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed in 2005, brought an end to what was Africa's longest civil war. It also opened northern Sudan up.
Now cool young Khartoum-ites dance at rap concerts, while traditional singers earn good livings from performing at weddings.
"This is beautiful, it's magic," one young man said, at a recent concert.
"I'm so happy, because I'm free to dance, there's no law and music is an international language," he added, thrusting his shoulders back rhythmically to the beat.
Mr Albaqir says Sudan's new willingness to listen to this international language is due in part to growing economic prosperity.
Then there are the effects of the peace deal - which brought non-Muslim southerners into national government.
"The CPA came with openings and freedoms," he says.
Map locator
"Also it brought new ideas because when Sudanese people left the country the intellectual vacuum was being filled with Islamist thought."
But the freedom is not absolute.
All large gatherings have to stop at 11pm - sometimes the Morality Police break up events.
But northern Sudanese can now appreciate - and make - music in public in a way that would have been inconceivable a few years ago.
Now you can listen to Western and Arabic pop music on the radio, or go to spoken word poetry events or open mic nights.
But it would be wrong to conclude that Sudan has totally changed.
Imams still regularly condemn music as un-Islamic.
Raucous

“Start Quote

Some people say that Sudan - the northern part - is going to be like an African Afghanistan. That would take us back to the Stone Age”
End Quote Ahmad Mahmoud
Outside the al-Shahid mosque - a vast structure on the banks of the Blue Nile, draped in decorative lights - young men said they felt their society had gone too far.
"Songs are forbidden under Islam," said one, adding that music encouraged the intermingling of men and women.
"If I was in charge I would ban all concerts," said another.
He might just get his wish.
In January Southern Sudanese will vote on possible independence, as part of the peace deal.
Already in the semi-autonomous south, you can drink a beer in a raucous nightclub, filled with sweaty, scantily-clad dancers near the River Nile.
The concern for many in the north is that if the south does split away, the Islamists who still control Khartoum might re-establish their previously dominant vision of society.
Woman in a bar in Juba (file photo) Nightclubs already open freely in Southern Sudan
"I do think the government will try to clamp down on society and the rules and regulations," said Mustapha Khogali, a drummer and concert promoter.
"They have even made statements saying they will ban the wearing of shorts and men having long hair and stuff like that."
But Mr Khogali is optimistic that Sudanese society has changed so much that there can be no going back; whatever the results of the referendum.
Fresh from firing out his lyrics in a bedroom rehearsal for his rap group, Rezoulution, 23-year-old Ahmad Mahmoud agrees.
He is uncertain about the future, as speculation that the south will secede continues to spread.
"Some people say that Sudan - the northern part - is going to be like an African Afghanistan. That would take us back to the Stone Age.
"But I'm going to speak my mind about the situation - I'm just going to take it down underground again and just try and rise from there."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-11812926

Africa loses $1.4bn yearly to spectrum colonisation


LAGOS – Chief Executive Officer of Asia Broadcast Satellite, ABS, Limited, Mr Thomas Choi, has said Africa and the Middle-East lose at least $1.4 billion annually in local market share due to spectrum colonisation.
This loss, however, goes to Europe and American markets.
Choi said this, weekend, in a paper, entitled: Spearheading Connectivity and Diversifying Revenue Streams, at the ongoing SATCOM Africa event in Johannesburg, South Africa.
He revealed that currently, the global revenue around the world, for all satellite services including the Direct to Home, DTH TV operations, was about $65 billion with the over 200 satellites in the orbit.
The revenue stream, however, favours Europe which has about 90 per cent market share, North and South America which have 90 per cent market share and Asia which has 70 per cent market share. It leaves Africa and the Middle-East which have 17 per cent market share in the lurch.
He, however, noted that in North and South America and Europe, Asia, there are local satellite operators who have their own spectrum licences that are providing services to their own local customers in their markets.
For him, all the money generated in this activity, remain in their markets. He said even worse for Africa was that about 90 per cent of available satellite spectrum belong to countries other than Africa and Middle-East, allowing such countries to put satellite over and above Africa.
He said: “Because the available spectrum right have been taken up by Europe, America and Asia, these countries serve over 80 per cent of the total satellite demand and even those coming from the African and the Middle- East regions.”


Islamic banking stirs up controversy in religiously-divided Nigeria

The governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria is fielding criticism for exacerbating the country's sectarian problems by allowing Islamic banking to make its debut in Nigeria.



By Alex ThurstonGuest blogger / June 27, 2011

Since last week, English and Hausa media in Nigeria have been closely following a controversy over Islamic banking in the country. At the center of the controversy is Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the dynamic and outspoken governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Since his tenure began in July 2009, Governor Sanusi’s bold moves to fire bankers and restructure banks have attracted worldwide attention. This year he is one of Time‘s 100 most influential people. Sanusi is no stranger to controversy: he has already locked horns with Nigerian lawmakers and the International Monetary Fund. Neither is he a stranger to the intricacies of Islamic thought: he is the grandson of an emir of Kano, he holds a degree in shari’a from Sudan, and he has debated religious topics with some of Nigeria’s most famous Muslim leaders.
The Islamic banking controversy concerns last Monday’s announcement that the CBN has given the go-ahead for JAIZ Bank, which the press calls “the first Islamic bank in the country,” and Tuesday’s issuance of final guidelines pertaining to Islamic banking in Nigeria. Although, as Next points out, “a draft framework for non-interest banking was issued in March 2009 by the [CBN], its position on Islamic banking did not become much of an issue until a few months ago when the final guidelines were released.” Sanusi ordered the guidelines to be rewritten in order to address and/or incorporate criticisms, but some Christian groups continue to denounce the changes.
For example, Bishop David Bakare of the Kaduna State chapter of the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) accuses Sanusi of harboring sectarian loyalties and of exacerbating interreligious tensions at a delicate moment:
“Honestly, if Governor Sanusi Lamido Sanusi had done this advocacy for Islamic banking as a religious leader, it would have made a better sense than as a government official. Therefore, Sanusi should come out and tell the nation whose errand he is running and for who he speaks; is it for himself, Islam, or government of Nigeria?
“The PFN, Kaduna State, strongly condemns the Central Bank governor’s Islamic banking agenda at a time like this in Nigeria when we are still battling to douse the tension created by the last ‘political’ crisis with all the evident religious manifestations.This obviously is an insensitive and reckless act of the highest order coming from such a high ranking officer of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“No right thinking Nigerian would ordinarily venture into such a sensitive matter at any time in such a nation like Nigeria without an evil motive to create more tension in the nation or worse still to start another religious fighting such as had never been before in this nation.“Somebody, please, help tell Sanusi to let the sleeping dog lie, and not put the nation into another avoidable distraction and dangerous crisis. We call on President Goodluck Jonathan not to wait until trouble begins before acting.”
 Similarly, the powerful Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) calls the introduction of Islamic banking a move to “Islamize Nigeria.”
Sanusi has responded to criticisms by saying that the attention to Islamic banking at CBN predates his tenure and that what is called “non-interest banking” attracts the involvement of non-Muslims as well, including backers of the JAIZ Bank. Sanusi has also highlighted the presence of Islamic banking systems in other countries around the world, including the United Kingdom.
The controversy has relevance for at least three reasons. First, it affects Muslim-Christian relations, and shows how interreligious tensions appear not only “on the ground” in terms of physical conflict, but also in debates among elites over questions of national policy. Second, it forms part of ongoing changes in Nigeria’s financial system. Finally, this controversy will be another challenge – and opportunity – for Governor Sanusi, who is one of the most important figures now in Nigerian politics. Judging from the wide press coverage the controversy is receiving, many Nigerian elites will be watching closely to see how the controversy unfolds.
For those wanting more background on how Islamic banking works, I recommend starting with the BBC’s Q&A, ReutersFactbox, or the Financial TimesBeginner’s Guide.
I was not able to find the most recent guidelines from CBN on Islamic banking, but here are the guidelines issued in December (.pdf).
Alex Thurston is a PhD student studying Islam in Africa at Northwestern University and blogs at Sahel Blog.
 
csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0627/Islamic-banking-stirs-up-controversy-in-religiously-divided-Nigeria/(page)/1

A comprehensive look at the history of attacks by Nigeria's Boko Haram

Boko Haram has been receiving more attention from the international community and media since its June 16 attack in Abuja. The scrutiny warrants a look at its history.


  Alex ThurstonGuest blogger / July 1, 2011
 
Fire fighters, put out a fire following an
 explosion, at the police headquarters,
in Abuja, Nigeria on June 16, 2011.
Boko Haram, a Muslim rebel movement based in northeastern Nigeria, is a frequent topic on this blog and has been a subject of increasing scrutiny by journalists and policymakers following the June 16 bombing at the police headquarters in Abuja. What follows is a list of Boko Haram’s attacks from July 2009 to the present. Given the vast number of incidents linked to Boko Haram, it is nearly impossible to compile a comprehensive list, but I’ve done the best I can. Please forgive the occasional inaccuracy or omission, and let me know if I’ve left out any incident.
There are a number of background pieces that give insights into Boko Haram. The BBC has a special report from Maiduguri, the stronghold of the movement. Reuters has a helpful Q&A on the movement, and al Jazeera has a backgrounder from 2010.
Here is the list. For each incident I have listed the date, method of attack, target (if known), location, and casualties.
  • The 2004 attacks in Kannama are often called a precursor to later uprisings.
  • July 26, 2009: Boko Haram launches mass uprising with attack on a police station in Bauchi, starting a five-day uprising that spread to Maiduguri and elsewhere.
  • September 7, 2010: Gunmen attack a prison in Bauchi, killing around five guards and freeing numerous prisoners, including former sect members.
  • October 6, 2010: Gunmen assassinate two security guards outside a politician’s home and, several hours later, assassinate ANPP leader Awana Ngala in Maiduguri.
  • October 9, 2010: Gunmen assassinate Muslim cleric Bashir Kashara and one of his students in Maiduguri. Separately, gunmen assassinate a police officer in Maiduguri.
  • October 11, 2010: Bombing/gun attack on a police station in Maiduguri destroys the station and injures three
  • December 28, 2010: Boko Haram claims responsibility for the Christmas Eve bombing in Jos that killed 38, but police are skeptical; Boko Haram also tied to an attack on churches in Maiduguri.
  • December 28, 2010: Gunmen assassinate a senior police officer and two others at a hospital in Maiduguri.
  • January 3, 2011: Gunmen assassinate a policeman in Maiduguri.
  • January 28, 2011: Gunmen assassinate ANPP gubernatorial candidate Modu Fannami Gubio and eight others in Maiduguri.
  • February 15, 2011: Gunmen attack a church in Maiduguri, no casualties confirmed.
  • February 20, 2011: Gunmen assassinate a policeman (in Maiduguri?).
  • February 23, 2011: Gunmen assassinate a policeman (in Maiduguri?).
  • February 28, 2011: Gunmen attack a police commander’s home and kill two policemen.
  • March 2, 2011: Gunmen assassinate two policemen in Maiduguri.
  • March 13, 2011: Gunmen assassinate Muslim cleric Imam Ibrahim Ahmed Abdullahi in Maiduguri.
  • March 27, 2011: Gunmen assassinate ANPP leader Alhaji Modu Gana Makanike in Maiduguri.
  • April 9, 2011: Bombings at polling places injure several and killing at least one person in Maiduguri.
  • April 20, 2011: A bombing in Maiduguri kills a policeman.
  • April 24, 2011: Four bombs explode in Maiduguri, killing at least three.
  • May 17, 2011: Gunmen kill a policeman in Maiduguri.
  • May 29, 2011: Bombings at an army barracks in Bauchi city and elsewhere later claimed by Boko Haram.
  • May 31, 2011: Gunmen assassinate Abba Anas Ibn Umar Garbai, brother of the Shehu of Borno, in Maiduguri.
  • June 6, 2011: Gunmen assassinate Muslim cleric Ibrahim Birkuti in Maiduguri.
  • June 7, 2011: Teams of gunmen launch parallel attacks with guns and bombs on a church and police stations in Maiduguri, killing five.
  • June 16, 2011: Bombing at police headquarters in Abuja, claimed by Boko Haram. Casualty reports vary.
  • June 20, 2011: Gunmen attack a bank and a police station in Kankara (Katsina State), but police later say they were bandits, not Boko Haram.
  • June 26, 2011: Gunmen shoot and bomb a bar in Maiduguri kills some 25 people.
I hope this list will permit deeper analysis of trends in these attacks. I may write something on that next week, but in the meantime definitely leave a comment if something leaps out at you.
Alex Thurston is a PhD student studying Islam in Africa at Northwestern University and blogs at Sahel Blog

 csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0701/A-comprehensive-look-at-the-history-of-attacks-by-Nigeria-s-Boko-Haram/(page)/1

Why Nigeria's tactics with the militant Boko Haram may not work

 

The Nigerian government's strategy for dealing with Boko Haram is based on its experience with militants in the Niger Delta, but Boko Haram's different grievances means those tactics may not work.




 Alex ThurstonGuest blogger / July 20, 2011
“If our dear late President Umaru Yar’Adua can restore peace to a more volatile area like the Niger Delta by extending Amnesty to the militants of the region and dialogue with them by resolving most of their grievances amicably, I don’t see why we can’t do the same to the Boko Haram.”
- Governor-elect (now Governor) Kashim Shettima of Borno State, Nigeria, May 2011
Shattered remnants are seen at the site of a bomb blast at a bar near a police barracks in the Nigerian northeastern city of Maiduguri on July 3. The explosion killed at least five people and injured 10 more, the latest apparent attack by radical Islamist sect Boko Haram.
Reuters
In 2009, President Umaru Yar’Adua launched an amnesty program that aimed to disarm, reintegrate, and employ militants in the Niger Delta. Prior to this, local anger over the failure of oil revenues to substantially benefit communities gave rise to armed movements that disrupted oil production. The government had deployed soldiers (the Joint Task Force or JTF) and militants, but only the amnesty seemed to offer a chance of lasting peace. The government’s two-pronged approach to the Delta – crackdown, then amnesty – helped tamp down the conflict there, though rumblings of discontent in the Delta, along with new threats from militants, indicate that it could resume.

Policymakers at both the federal and the state level largely see the problem of Boko Haram, the Muslim rebel group that is spreading violence outward from its stronghold in the Northeastern city of Maiduguri, Borno State, through the lens of the Niger Delta. The precedent of the Niger Delta force-then-amnesty policy, the perception of its at least partial success, and the existence of groups with significant experience in dialogue with militants, helps explain why some officials urge the application of the same formula in the northeast. The military is already in Maiduguri, and force has long been an element of the state response to Boko Haram. The persistence with which the idea of amnesty returns in government circles, though – even when Boko Haram rejects it time after time – shows how strongly the example of the Delta has shaped Nigerian policy responses to violent groups.
The analogy with the Delta also shapes an understanding of what the root causes of Boko Haram’s emergence are. Figures like Governor Shettima, along with virtually every analyst, believes that northern Nigeria’s problems – poverty, feelings of political isolation, deficient infrastructure, lack of broad access to higher Western-style education, etc – play some role in sustaining Boko Haram.
The challenge lies in moving from a general understanding of factors at work in Boko Haram’s existence to a specific understanding of the movement’s grievances and, finally, to nuanced policy tools that could reintegrate members of the movement into society or undercut its grassroots support.
The analogy with the Delta is helpful in the sense that it encourages examination of root causes of violence; it becomes less helpful if policymakers stop at the level of generalities (e.g., “we need more schools”) instead of thinking about what factors make Boko Haram, and Northeastern Nigeria, unique.
One place where a general analogy between the Niger Delta and Northeastern Nigeria breaks down is in the differences between groups like the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) and Boko Haram. It would be a mistake to say that religion (Christianity, local religions, and even Islam) is not a force in the Niger Delta, but the grievances of MEND have to do with the distribution of wealth resulting from one natural resource, oil. The grievances Boko Haram expresses are more diverse, less material, and are explicitly articulated as religious politics: Boko Haram wants stronger shari’a, it wants a purification of society, etc.
If the grievances are different, the solutions to address them must of necessity be at least somewhat different. More schools could help reduce feelings of marginalization in the North. But to reach a group whose very name connotes a rejection of Western education, not only as a phenomenon but also as a symbol of “un-Islamic” governance in Nigeria, an educational initiative would have to be introduced carefully indeed.
Shettima, who has shown substantial political courage, recognizes this, of course. Shettima has been the foremost proponent of an amnesty for Boko Haram, but he has also begun putting forward religious arguments against violence, invoking Islam as both theology and as a historical way of life in the Northeast:
According to him, targeting innocent souls for attacks irrespective of religion and ethnicity, among others, was alien to Islam.”The targeting of innocent and unarmed civilians regardless of their ethnicity, race and or religious beliefs is alien not only to our norms and culture, but alien to the fundamental doctrines of Islam.”
He said Borno, as a home of Islam over the years, had enjoyed great harmony among the different tribes and religious groups.
“In over the 1,000 years that Islam has taken roots in Borno, it has indeed affected the lives of our people positively, and has through its doctrines guided our daily lives.
“It also guided our interpersonal relations ranging from social to economic interactions.”
These arguments underscore the historical, cultural, and political differences between the Niger Delta and the Northeast.
There are certainly lessons that policymakers can take from the former conflict and apply to the latter. But past a certain point, general similarities end. The problem of Boko Haram will require its own solutions.
Alex Thurston is a PhD student studying Islam in Africa at Northwestern University and blogs at Sahel Blog.

csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0720/Why-Nigeria-s-tactics-with-the-militant-Boko-Haram-may-not-work/(page)/1

Cameron: Nigeria is a Dream Waiting to Happen

British Prime Minister David Cameron has described the Nigeria as a dream waiting to happen, highlighting the projection that the country would have the fastest growing GDP in the world in the next 40 years.


Cameron, who was on a brief visit to Nigeria, made the remarks as Guest Speaker at the Pan African University, Ajah, Lagos, Tuesday.


He also met with President Goodluck Jonathan at the State House, Marina, after which both leaders announced that the two countries have agreed to co-operate on a number of areas, particularly to fight terrorist threat in Africa’s most populous country.


In his lecture, Cameron said: "Tell me this: which part of the world has seen its number of democracies increase nearly eight-fold in just two decades? Eastern Europe? No, it’s Africa. Which continent has six of the ten fastest growing economies in the world? Asia? No, it’s Africa. Which country is predicted by some to have the highest average GDP growth in the world over the next 40 years? You might think Brazil, Russia, India or China. No. Think Africa. Think Nigeria.


"The point I want to make today, is this: This can be Africa’s moment. Africa is transforming in a way no-one thought possible 20 years ago, and suddenly a whole new future seems within reach. I have known for a long time about the tremendous energy and ingenuity of the Nigerian people. From the civil activism of the churches of South London to the contribution of Nigerians to British business, law, medicine, sport and music, I have seen the passion and enterprise of Nigerians changing my country for the better. But what I have seen in London I have seen a hundred-fold here today.


"From Eko Atlantic and Balogun Street Market to the biggest port in the most populous country in Africa, you (Governor Raji Fashola of Lagos) are transforming your city. And your fellow Africans are doing the same all over the continent. Today there are unprecedented opportunities to trade and grow, raise living standards and lift billions from poverty. So I urge you: seize these opportunities, grab them, shape them."


And as the nation grapples with the Boko Haram insurgency, the UK yesterday promised to share its expertise in anti-terrorism with the Nigerian government.


The other areas of cooperation between the two countries which Nigeria is expected to benefit from are: to improve education, check stealing of crude oil from the Niger Delta, improve power supply and reduce maternal and child mortality.


President Goodluck Jonathan and Cameron acknowledged the importance of Nigeria as a stabilising factor both in the region and the African continent.


Jonathan used the opportunity to press for UK’s support for Nigeria’s quest for a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, saying the role Nigeria had played in ensuring democratic rule across the West African region and the continent stood it out for the position.


Speaking first after their meeting at the State House, Marina, Lagos, Cameron congratulated Jonathan for his victory at the April polls and said Nigeria was important to Britain especially with its massive economic potentials recording a growth rate of 8 per cent per annum.


He identified issues confronting Nigeria such as security, terrorism, illegal migration, high child and maternal mortality and a dwindling economy.


Cameron said remedial steps would be taken to address the challenges, starting with increasing the volume of trade between the two countries to £8 billion in 2014 and doubling power supply within the same period.


He said: "I congratulate you once again on your election victory. And anyone in doubt why Africa matters to Britain should just look at Nigeria. A country with massive potentials growing by 8 percent a year and said to be the largest in Africa. The economy of Lagos alone is the size of 32 African countries added together. A country with security issues, terrorism, crime, illegal immigration. And a country with a 10thof the world children out of school, a 10th of women dying at child birth… Nigeria presents a development challenge that must be met if we are ever to meet the millennium development goals. President Jonathan and I today agreed and set agenda in each of these areas.


"First on trade, we agreed to double trade between our two countries by 2014 to £8 billion. We agreed to double Nigeria's power supply by 2015 to address one of the biggest obstacles to Nigeria's growth. I welcome the president's leadership role to liberalise trade in West Africa. On my part, I agreed we will support this ultimate goal of free trade."


In what Cameron described as "new partnership" on the security threat to the state, he said: "We have agreed to a significant new partnership on counter-terrorism. Britain will help Nigeria establish the equivalent of what we use in Britain during national emergencies. And I am very pleased that the Nigeria Parliament has reintroduced a law on the exchange of foreign national prisoners. The 650 Nigerians in British jails have cost many pounds a year and I agreed on President Jonathan's efforts to resolve this problem and I am very grateful for your help."


Jonathan admitted that Nigeria had its challenges, the most recent of which was terrorist attacks by Boko Haram and other related organisations which operate along the same lines of reasoning and persuasion which often had been hijacked and exacerbated by "some elements".


He particularly called for help in tracking and ensuring the stoppage of oil theft in the Niger Delta with which he said the perpetrators buy arms and hand over to youths to protect their illicit trade.


"We are going to work together to make sure that this terrorist attacks we are having and other related issues are dealt with. Those of us who are Nigerians know that the greatest problem we have in the Niger Delta is not just the youth agitating for better things for their communities,but those who steal crude oil make the area ungovernable," he said.


He said the British had a programme for a specialised resource work with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to fingerprint the Nigerian crude so that wherever it is sold, "we would be able to link it to those refineries that are refining it".


On MDGs,he lamented that the country was lagging behind as statistical data showed a damning position but noted that with hard work and commitment, by 2015 when his administration is supposed to exit the stage, it would have been remedied.





Boko Haram: Angry MEND Blasts President Jonathan Over ‘Double Standards’

Return Of Boro’s Ghost As Militants Demand Republic Of Niger Delta-NDLF

Posted by siteadmin
 
Isaac Boro insurgency
The ghost of Major Isaac Adako Boro who declared the short-lived Niger Delta Republic in January 1966, with his Niger Delta Volunteer Force (NDVF) refuses to lie low in his grave as it keeps haunting the federal government. Last week, another militant group, Niger Delta Liberation Force (NDLF)  demanded the actualization of Republic of Niger Delta, through sovereign national conference, a solution to the incessant bombing and killing of innocent people by Northern Islamic sects, Boko Haram.
Over fourty five years, Major Isaac Adaka Boro, an under graduatehe student of Chemistry of the University of Nsuka, declared the short-lived Republic of Niger through Niger Delta Volunteer Force (NDVF) with about one hundred and fifty fighters who launched guerrilla warfare against the federal government of General J.T.U Aguiyi Ironsi against injustice and marginalization of the oil wealth of the people of Niger Delta.

  Earlier in January 1966, Major Boro had proclaimed the Niger Delta People Republic . He headed the new republic as head of state and commander of the armed forces, seceded from Nigerian government. The federal forces of Nigerian government over ran Boro’s force in twelve days bloody confrontation with the federal troops suffered a greater casualty.
Consequently, the Biafran civil war broke upon and General Gowon Yakubu gave amnesty to Boro and his followers. Almost all Boro fighters were recruited into the Nigerian army, including the NDVF leader, Boro himself who was decorated a major of Nigerian army at the age of 3o years. The choice of Isaac Boro was mainly to tap the wealth of experience of guerrilla warfare and the amphibious war tactics into the Nigerian army to defend and conquer the dreaded Biafra soldiers.
Major Isaac Boro offered to give his military prowess to the Nigerian army because the Biafra map was questionable as it covered beyond the territories of the Igbo speaking enclave. This Boro sees as an affront on the part of the Biafra leaders, especially old rivers state and other parts of the Ijaw, Ibibio, Calabar, Urhobo, Isoko and Itsekiri were visibly made citizens of the fallen Biafra map. The people were angry and fought on the side of federal government to protect their lands and mineral resources against the Biafra . The Niger Delta people were scared that the Biafra Republic was another form of enslavement in their own land, if allowed to survive. The graphic design of the Biafra map was their major fear of Igbo domination and they fought against the survival of the Biafra Republic .  The very ethnic nationalities in Niger Delta territories were carved into Biafra against their choice and they joined forces with federal troops.
The Igbos accused the people of Niger Delta of betrayal and they saw them as their major albatross from the actualization of Biafra Republic . But the Niger Delta people defended their action, saying that it was the Igbos that were trying to betray them by taken their territories into their map without consulting them and intimate them of the benefits they stand to gain at the successful realization of the Biafra Republic .
 There is the school of thought that the decision by the Igbos to add Niger Delta region into Biafra map was due to the oil wealth of the region which they intended to boost their economy as a new nation. But it was a failed project. The Biafra Republic tentative map is seen as a satanic document by many in Niger Delta up till date.
The Nigerian government gained the military exploit of Boro and his co-Ijaw soldiers during the war. As the war was gradually fading away in 1968, Boro and his soldiers were returning from a victorious attack, evil was locking in the corner, as the Nigerian military authorities had done with the services of Boro and he was pinned down for assassination on May 9th 1968 by Col. Benjamin Adekunle, aka (red scorpion) a sniper pulled the trigger and brought to an end the life of a young promising brave revolutionary soldier.  Boro was born September 10th 1938 in Oloibiri, hailed from Kaiama.
Why government assassinated Isaac Boro? Insiders at government quarter disclosed that the military prowess of Isaac Boro was overwhelming, especially during his confrontation with the military in twelve days revolution where countless federal troops fell to Boro’s revolutionary army. The government of General Gowon Yakubu was scared that if Isaac Boro is allowed that survive with additional heigher military training as a senior combatant officer, he was considered a security threat to federal government with his high dream of unaccomplished Republic of Niger Delta . He was assassinated to close the chapter of further Niger Delta republic and arms agitation in the region. But Isaac Boro’s ghost refuses to lie low in his grave over fourty five years as it continue to haunt federal government with more vehement violent arms struggle from Niger Delta in stage by stage.
In 1994, Ken Saro-Wiwa took over the Niger Delta Struggle against injustice; a non-violent approach from the gun option to pen. But he was hanged to death through a kangaroo tribunal by late General Sanni Abacha and nine other Ogoni leaders. The death of Ken-Saro Wiwa was sponsored by Anglo-Dutch Shell Company operating in Ogoniland with no form of compensation to the locals on their damaged environment as result of SHEEL activities. Ken Saro Wiwa, an environmentalist took up a great fight against shell by exposing its atrocities to the people of Ogoniland to the world. In early 2000, the Isaac Boro gun violent arms agitation returned. This time, Isaac Boro’s ghost entered through Alhaji Asari Muhaji Dokubo who became very enraged against federal government and multinationals in Niger Delta, especially Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC). Asari Dokubo formed the Niger Delta People Volunteer Force (NDPVF) recruited thousands of youths returned to the violent arms struggle against the Nigerian authorities. Asari Dokubo became a bone in the throat of President Olusegun Obasanjo administration as NDPVF soldiers crippled almost Nigerian economy by blowing up oil pipelines and kidnapping of foreign multinational staff for ransom. The violent arms struggle affected global oil price as it was sky-rocketed beyond unimaginable trend. The government lured Asari to submission by arresting him under a negotiation visit to Abuja with presidential jet one way air ticket
The arrest and detention of Asari Dokubo increased more agitation as various gropus sprang up to defend Asari’s course fearlessly. Tompolo, Boyloaf, Ateke Tom and others recruited hundreds of youths to prosecute the Niger Delta struggle. Then, another major persona Mr. Henry Okah who was seen brain behind the arms shipment to Niger Delta as an international arms dealer from Niger Delta who did not sells arms but dictate the pace for local fighters as their leader under the dreaded militant group, Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta. This group fought harder than all the groups in Niger Delta as in 1999 general election, due to the strong agitation. The vice presidential slot in Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) was zoned core Niger Delta, which if eventually won, may pipe low the agitators as a part of negotiation factor. Dr.Goodluck Jonathan was the choice of that arms struggle negotiation factor. The good luck shone on Dr.Goodluck Jonathan who became full President after the death of his boss President Alhaji Musa Yar’Adua through the invocation of the provision of the constitution of necessity. By divine providence, Goodluck Jonathan contested the 2011 presidential general election as sitting president and won in free, fair and credible polls.
However, before the federal amnesty programme, the government of Nigerian carried out different extra-judicial measures to tackle the Niger Delta insurgency with communities bombarded with military planes as the Niger Delta Struggle gets intensified. The region appeared like a war zone like Afghanistan or Dafur ( Sudan ). Soldiers of federal troops invaded civil population and caused genocide in many communities. Raping and abuse of human rights was rampart in Niger Delta region.
In 2009, the government of President Alhaji Musa Yar’Adua saw that the arms agitation of the youths of Niger Delta could translate to another civil war, if not carefully handled. President Yar’Adua implored the constitutional provision of amnesty to allow the young men to surrender their weapons to federal government voluntarily, when force for force had failed.
The Niger Delta Liberation Force (NDLF) led by a renegade ex-militant leader General John Togo abandoned the oath of amnesty after one year of federal government amnesty to launch another severe and bloody war on the Nigerian authorities. Reason for his fall-out from the amnesty programme was that federal government being run by a Niger Delta President Goodluck Jonathan had failed to implement the promises of former President Yar’Adua after his sudden death. Yar’dua had promised the ex-militants to develop the Niger Delta region after holding a post-amnesty conference with the various leaders of ex-militant leaders to come up with a Mou with the Niger Delta oil producing communities. But President Goodluck Jonthan had a different thought about the concept of the post-amnesty conference. The supposed death NDLF leader General John Togo in a shoot-out with federal troops during an aerial raid on his Israel barracks left an open wound on the federal amnesty programme unanswered question on developmental issues.
Last week, the worst had come from the NDLF as the militant group had demanded Republic of Niger Delta as a response to the incessant bombing and killing of innocent people by Boko Haram Islamic militant sects, victims especially South-South citizens soon after the 2011 presidential election was declared with President Goodluck Jonathan emerged in a keenly contested election free, fair and credible poll. The group had urged President Goodluck Jonathan to urgently convene sovereign national conference comprising all ethnic nationalities to address the togetherness or separation of Nigeria as a political solution to Nigeria ’s problem
NDLF spokesman “Captain” Mark Anthony said “In SNC, every ethnic nationality shall come forward through a delegation and put up a referendum for the interest of every geo-political region. The referendum shall determine the continued existence or separation of the contraption called Nigeria . Nigeria is a creation of falsehood and it is standing on a keg of gun powder being mismanaged by former military dictators.
“We use this medium to hail great men like Chief Odumegwu Ojukwu, late Major Isaac Boro, Ken Saro-Wiwa and their followers, as well as all freedom fighters who had paid the supreme price with their lives for Biafra and Niger Delta, for their courage and patriotism. These great men were men of vision who saw the type of fake Nigeria left behind for us by the British imperialists.
“We also hail the people of the new South Sudan nation for their determination and doggedness. We the people of Niger Delta shall one day join the world to celebrate Niger Delta Republic . Nobody should deceive himself and play politics with our call for splitting Nigeria into segments for the interest of every geo-political region,” he added.

saharareporters.com/press-release/return-boro%E2%80%99s-ghost-militants-demand-republic-niger-delta-ndlf

Oil Spikes, Double Dips And Dilapidated Dollars


 

Mar. 10 2011 - 2:59 pm |
By BILL FLAX
A typical Mobil gas station. This one is locat...
Image via Wikipedia
Recent headlines blare like warning sirens: oil prices soar to pre-recession heights and proceed relentlessly higher. Will gas go to $5? Even inflation deniers like Ben Bernanke acknowledge the danger this poses to the still tenuous recovery; although the mainstream commentariat conveniently blames pandemonium in the Middle East.

To understand whether our recovery is in jeopardy, we must first grasp what prospers us, why economies recede and then what rejuvenates them.
There is a natural symphony to the market. Everyone seeks the best available outcome. Our unlimited desires are tempered by scarcity, yet we all strive to get what we can while wanting still more. Price signals orchestrate this perpetual friction between buyers and sellers into a concert of mutual satisfaction.

Wealth creation emanates from the value sellers add for which buyers are willing to pay, but buyers ensure efficient utilization of resources by insisting on lower prices. The more freely prices may move and the more certain the scale, the better the invisible hand can conduct a harmonious improvement in living standards for all.
A recession occurs when our aggregate output veers off tempo from society’s wants. GDP represents a basket of goods and services. If our demands shift dramatically or discord renders existing production unprofitable, the economy must correct. A recession is the process by which producers are redirected back into concert with what consumers now request, as can be produced profitably.
The freer the economy is left to transition toward fulfilling the demands of the new era, the faster recovery hums back into tune. When politicians prop up failing firms or resurrect dying industries, they trap precious resources in arrangements focused to the old market realities. Bailing out the failures of the past prevents the successes of the future.
Neither does deficit spending stimulate the instruments of wealth generation. Politicized spending rudely interrupts the market’s performance by intercepting scarce resources and parking them in uneconomic overtures to favored sections of the audience.
Conversely, Schumpeterian creative destruction transfers capital and resources into bands playing fresh numbers while composing innovative products ready for the challenges of the new paradigm. We cannot continue building houses in Las Vegas or other locales where a plethora of homes sit vacant. Nor should we manufacture goods rendered obsolete by technological advances or shifting tastes.
Investors grasp this quickly. Homebuilders in overbuilt areas and firms producing what consumers no longer value are accordingly deprived of capital. This inflicts pain on those workers, suppliers, and investors, but the market adjusts except where recovery gets drowned under the din of interventionist clatter.
Capital chases the choicest ideas in pursuit of profit. Where capital flows, jobs follow and growth renews. The market allows the finest instruments and best artists to achieve profits, which trickle into goods, jobs and amusements for the rest of us.
Growth continues chiming along until some large scale change triggers numerous firms across varied industries to suffer simultaneously. Rarely could one firm’s folly or another’s brilliance alter the market’s rhythm.
Oil shocks have frequently instigated such large scale dissonance. Many industries and nearly everyone personally gets hurt by rising gas prices. If this happens gradually, we adjust, but a rapid increase creates chaos. Heretofore profitable firms get squeezed as rising transportation costs overwhelm thin margins. If energy remains expensive for an extended period, the entire economy suffers as the number of failed firms mounts.
Recessions in the mid Seventies, after the first Gulf War and even the Great Recession of late were all attributed to rising fuel costs. Hence the renewed concern that the current spike could knock recovery off key.
What causes oil to spike?
The price of anything has three components: supply, demand and the scale used for measurement. As we demand more of something buyers bid its price higher. If the available supply increases faster, the price falls.
An infinite array of factors can shift either supply or demand. Demand for oil increased over recent decades as previously moribund economies such as the former Soviet Union, India and China joined the chorus. They consume far more energy. Demand also fluctuates as the world economy goes through cyclical gyrations.
Supply can be curtailed by OPEC, though not as drastically as people assume. Or it can be hindered by environmentalists extorting politicians into refusing to let us drill. Supply has recently been threatened by the internal unrest in several large oil producing nations. This invited speculators to bet on rising prices.
But the ebbs and flows of international commerce cannot entirely account for the roller coaster ride of oil. Speculators may accelerate these turns, but when they bet rightly this actually smoothes the spike by moving the increase forward. It thus becomes more gradual. When wrong, the speculators lose dearly as prices fall.
There must be more here than normal cyclical movements or speculation. Thomas Carlyle said, “Teach a parrot to say ‘supply and demand’ and you have an economist.” Most currencies were then defined in terms of gold or silver. No more.
Now supply and demand dance on a wobbly scale, which corrupts price signals and misdirects capital and resources. Even successful firms generating value for customers can be knocked off balance. As the dollar slips prices leap for anything denominated in dollars. Fluctuations in the dollar will always appear first in international commodities such as gold, oil or food ingredients.
Were the dollar still defined in terms of gold, or at least defended by our monetary masters, fuel’s cost would be purely derived from changes in supply relative to demand. But everything from foreign currencies (the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand dollars all test record highs) to precious metals (setting new records almost daily) and crop futures (corn and wheat have nearly doubled this year). None of this can be blamed on North Africa’s discord.
Turmoil abroad has certainly lifted oil prices, but they were rising rapidly long before Tunisia, Egypt and Libya revolted. As investors around the world fled to the safety of the dollar in late 2008, oil cost $35 a barrel. It had already crested $80 and trended towards the century mark long before the Arab world rattled.
Producers, whose cost structures include any of these commodities, which to some degree include everyone, will stumble badly. During the Bretton Woods era, with the dollar pegged to gold – at least tentatively – oil prices remained remarkably steady. After the dollar began to float in 1971, both oil and gold soared. Now they soar again. Or do they?
Perhaps oil doesn’t soar, but the dollar plummets. Will it take our recovery down too.

blogs.forbes.com/billflax/2011/03/10/oil-spikes-double-dips-and-dilapidated-dollars/


National Chairman: Fresh zoning crisis hits PDP

By
 President Goodluck Jonathan
President Goodluck Jonathan
• Stakeholders Forum petitions Jonathan, recommends Nwachukwu, Ohakim, Mbadinuju, Metuh, 11 others

A fresh zoning crisis has erupted in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) following latest demand by some stakeholders in the party that the South-East ought to produce the new National Chairman. 
The stakeholders who recommended 15 candidates from the South-East have sent the list to President Goodluck Jonathan, the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and all PDP governors. 
The development has caused a twist in the race to succeed the out-going acting National Chairman of the party, Dr. Mohammed Haliru Bello, who has been nominated as a Minister. 
About 23 likely candidates may now vie for the office of the National Chairman of the party. 
Before the renewed interest of the South-East, the party had initially conceded the slot to the North-East leading to the emergence of eight aspirants. 

The eight aspirants from the North-East are Nigeria’s former Ambassador to the United States, Dr. Hassan Adamu, ex-Governor of the defunct Gongola State, Alhaji Bamanga Muhammed Tukur; ex-Minister of Petroleum, Prof. Jibril Aminu (Adamawa); ex-Minister of Commerce, Ambassador Idris Waziri (Taraba); ex-Minister of Agriculture, Alhaji Shettima Mustapha. ASlso in the race are a former National Chairman of the defunct The Grassroots Democratic Movement, (GDM), Alhaji Gambo Lawan (Borno); ex-Governor Adamu Mu’azu (Bauchi) and ex-Governor Danjuma Goje, who was recently elected a Senator from Gombe State. 
But in a petition to the President and top leaders of the party, PDP Stakeholders Forum insisted that the slot should go to the South-East, which has no single representation in the party’s National Working Committee at present. 
In the petition, signed by Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere (a former member, PDP Presidential Campaign Council); Ambassador Adamu Mustapha; and Chief Segun Babalola, the Stakeholders Forum asked the party to choose its next chairman from 15 potentially good candidates for the slot. 
Those recommended are: Chief Ojo Maduekwe; Mao Ohuanbuwa; Senator Ike Nwachukwu; Chief Olisa Metu; former Governor  Chinwoke Mbadinuju; Jerry Ugokwe; former Governor Sam Egwu; and Senator Emma Azu Agboti. Others are Senator Sylvanus Ngele; former Governor Jim Nwobodo; Enugu State PDP Chair, Chief Vita Abba; former Minister Frank Nweke Jr.; former Governor  Ikedi Ohakim; Nze Fidelis Ozichukwu; and Jeff Ojinika. 
The petition of the stakeholders reads in part: “As you are already aware, an emergency NEC meeting of our great party is about to be summoned in the days ahead for the purpose of addressing crucial party matters, especially the appointment of an Acting National Chairman for our great Party. 
“The South-East is the only zone in Nigeria that has the legal and political right to continue to produce the acting National Chairman of PDP till the expiration of its four-year tenure and that of the other members of the present (PDP National Working Committee) NWC on March 8, 2012. 
“It must be noted here that the National Chairmanship of the PDP was zoned to the South-East in 2008 for a four -year tenure that will terminate in 2012, which led to the election of Chief Vincent Ogbulafor as the National Chairman and other PDP NWC members in accordance with Article 14 and 16 of the PDP Constitution at the March 8, 2008 National Convention. 
“The constitution of PDP in Article 14(5) has made provision that any vacancy in this NWC must be filled in acting capacity by the same zone which produced the former elected national officer and this was the same reason that made the PDP NEC to appoint Chief Okwesilieze Nwodo who was later removed as the acting National Chairman of PDP to replace Chief Vincent Ogbulafor, who is equally from the South-East. 
“The issue of which zone that should produce the next acting National Chairman of PDP should not raise any controversy because the PDP constitution made express provision that the acting Chairman must emerge from the South-East.”
 The stakeholders cited Article 14(5) of the PDP Constitution to back their demand. 
The said article reads: “Where a vacancy occurs in any of the offices of the party, the NEC shall appoint a substitute from the zone where the officer originated pending the conduct of election to fill the vacancy” 
“It must be shamefully noted here that the South-East since the removal of Chief Vincent Ogbulafor and Chief Okwesilieze Nwodo as National Chairmen of the PDP is the only zone in the country that has no single representation in the PDP 12-member NWC up till today as a result of the inability of the PDP NEC to appoint an acting Chairman from the South-East to replace Nwodo because of electioneering and closeness of the 2011 General election then. 
“This situation is illegal and it is unfair that a whole region which massively voted for the PDP can be denied its legal and constitutional position in the PDP NWC, while a zone like the North-East has been enjoying its three positions in the NWC uninterrupted since 2008 up till now.”
They urged the President and NEC members to ignore the agitation for the office of PDP National Chairman by the North-East. 
They said: “It is embarrassing that majority of our party leaders are not aware of any single provision in the party constitution because if they do, the unnecessary lobbying and campaigns for the appointment of an acting chairman from the North-East would not have arisen because it is a blind agitation backed by political illiteracy and ignorance of the inner workings of the PDP and its constitution.”

thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/11224-national-chairman-fresh-zoning-crisis-hits-pdp.html

El-Rufai arrested, released

By
 
 
• May be arraigned for sedition on Monday

Former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, who was arrested yesterday mornng by  the  State Security Service (SSS)  operatives at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja,  was released late last night.  
ex-Minister elrufai
ex-Minister elrufai


“They accosted me on my return to the country, took my phone,  interrogated me, and held me incommunicado for many hours. You can speak to me now because I am back in my house,” he told our correspondent early this morning in Abuja.
He declined to speak further on his release. But there are indications that he may be arraigned on Monday for alleged sedition.
The ex-Minister had travelled to the United Kingdom with the presidential candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change, General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) and running mate, Pastor Tunde Bakare, for a symposium at Chatham House in London on the last general elections.
El-Rufai was reportedly arrested in the presence of his wife, Hajiya Hadiza, and a friend who came to welcome him.

Former Head of State and presidential candidate of the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), General Muhammadu Buhari,  condemned the arrest, describing it as a brazen act of intimidation, harassment and flagrant violation of citizen's rights in a democratic atmosphere.
 According to him, the arrest signified that "there are more people in our country who know how to win by hook and crook than those who know how to make proper use of their 'victory'".
However, a source close to the intelligence community told The Nation on Sunday that the former minister was arrested for writing inciting articles in the media.
According to the source, “The ex-Minister may have a case to answer for allegedly inciting the military against the government. Both at Chatham House and in his column on (This Day newspapers) Friday, el-Rufai allegedly tried to mislead readers with false figures by claiming that the National Security Adviser, Gen. Andrew Azazi will control and spend N208billion this year to manage the nation’s security.
“He also said that the NSA, the Police and Defence will spend combined votes of N865billion.”
The said offensive aspect in el-Rufai’s column reads in part:  “An interesting observation is the fact that the government said the problem of power shortage is a priority, yet the Ministry of Power got N91billion as total appropriation in 2011 while the National Security Adviser(NSA) controls and will spend N208billion(recurrent-N51billion, capital-N59billion, and another N98billion for the amnesty programme!)
“This amount does not include the Defence budget. The Defence Ministry will get N348billion, while the Police will get N309billion.  In other words, though Nigerians have never felt so insecure in recent history, the NSA, Police, and Defence will spend a combined N865billion-more than N2billion a day, weekends included! This does not include the 36 states’ so-called security votes.”
The reliable source in the SSS, who spoke in confidence, said: “We picked him up because he wrote lies. In the Appropriation (Amendment) Bill 2011 passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives on May 25 and signed into law by President Goodluck Jonathan on May 26, 2011, the Intelligence Community got a total allocation of N109,855,099,466 (approximated to N109.855bilion) which splits as follows: the Office of the National Security Adviser – N40,846,937,023; Directorate of State Security (that is the SSS) – N23,452,705,993; National Intelligence Agency – N27,720,580,338; and the Presidential Air Fleet –N17,834,876,113. “So where did el-Rufai get his N208billion? Even then, all the funds due to Intelligence Community are controlled by the Permanent Secretary (Social Services) in the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF).         
“When did Amnesty Programme become part of Intelligence Community whose votes are being managed by the National Security Adviser?  It is very wrong and inciting to manufacture figures and present them as truth because you lost out somewhere and suddenly realised you should become relevant by writing a column in a newspaper. He is certainly appearing in court on Monday.”
A formal statement by the SSS by its Assistant Director, Public Relations, Marilyn Ogar, confirmed that el-Rufai was arrested over inciting articles.  The statement said: “At 0500 hours of 2nd July, 2011, Mallam Nasiru El-Rufai, the former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) was intercepted on arrival at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.
“This became necessary following Mallam el-Rufai’s recent articles in the cyber and print media which have been considered by well-meaning Nigerians to be inciting, inflammatory and grossly misleading. For instance, his column on the back page of This Day newspaper of July 1, 2011, titled “What Nigeria Pays FG” clearly attests to this.
 
“It is pertinent to note that the Freedom of Information Bill (FOI BILL) has been passed into law, yet he refused to cross check his facts before publishing. He rather chose to misinform the public with mischievously orchestrated data with the intent of causing disaffection among the populace thereby subverting Government.
“It is expected that the former minister should have been more circumspect against the backdrop of current security challenges in the country. Nigeria belongs to all of us and no one should take laws into their hands as no one is above the law.”
But in a statement, the media consultant to the former minister, Mr. Muyiwa Adekeye, said the SSS had made el-Rufai incommunicado. In the statement he said: “Mallam Nasir el- Rufai was this morning arrested at Abuja airport as he arrived from London aboard a British Airways flight.  SSS operatives later whisked him to their headquarters where he was hauled before their Director-General.
“All efforts to establish contacts with him have since proved abortive and the SSS has given no word to his family and lawyers who have kept vigil.”
On the fact that the former minister’s arrest might be due to his newspaper column, Mr. Adekeye said, “This figure is in the 2011 Appropriation Act which is a public document. Bringing information in the public domain to the people  cannot by any stretch of the imagination be a crime even if it embarrasses security chiefs who, on the evidence of insecurity in the land, are not delivering value despite securing tidy budgetary allocations! If the facts in el-Rufai’s article, ‘What Nigerians pay FG’, are wrong in fact or context, that cannot be remedied by a denial of liberty.
The government should simply publish its alternative narrative, and let the public decide. Mallam el-Rufai has not done anything illegal by encouraging discourse about what our government costs us. 
He has been outspoken about his concerns regarding the direction the current government is taking this country, and he has written critical pieces on this matter on Nigerian and international media platforms. Free speech is a constitutional right, and it implies the obligation by the state to defend even those whose views are not congruent with the powers that be.”
He described the arrest of his client as a resort to “arm-twisting and harassment,”which should not be in a democracy.”

 thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/11226-el-rufai-arrested-released.html